published on in News

The Real Reason North Dakota Doesn't Allow Chain Pharmacies

According to NPR, North Dakota law states that any pharmacy must be at least 51% owned by an actual pharmacist. The rationale behind the law is that pharmacist-owned outlets will provide better service to the customer, and that the law would protect small-business owners from corporate monopolies. Those opposed to the law — and there are many — argue that prohibiting chain pharmacies only hurts the average consumer, reducing competition, and therefore driving up prices.

One such opponent wrote in the Bismarck Cafe that repealing the North Dakota law could lower the price of prescription medications in the state and that there's very little evidence that pharmacies, chain or otherwise, make all that many mistakes when dispensing medications. Furthermore, it's argued that chain pharmacies would not immediately invade the sparsely populated state but instead, target the relatively urban areas, letting local pharmacies continue catering to their rural clientele.

These assertions are backed up by analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation, which reflected that as of 2004, North Dakotans do, in fact, pay more for their drugs than in neighboring states. Nevertheless, chain pharmacies continue to be prohibited within the North Dakota state line despite repeated attempts to repeal the law.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7qL7Up56eZpOkunCClHJrb29fqbWmedGemKVlopqutLvNZqWoqqSdeqWtyqirmmWUpLK0utNmmKWkn6x6pLTAoqVmqJiWv66twqKcrGc%3D